The Shape Of You

Mar. 11th, 2026 09:59 pm
[syndicated profile] questionable_content_feed

At first I was like "is an Ed Sheeran reference going to make this comic seem dated" but then remembered Ed Sheeran's music sucks no matter what year it is

[syndicated profile] loweringthebar_feed

Posted by Kevin

a fail stamp

So you remember last year when I asked you to please do your best not to appear in the “AI Hallucination Database”? See Please Do Your Best Not to Appear in the ‘AI Hallucination Database’” (June 6, 2025). You do? Terrific. Because I don’t want you to end up like the now-former Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina, a man who now regrets his decision to use AI to draft a brief.

In general, I think a good rule of thumb is: try to live your life in such a way that no judge feels compelled to create a slide deck to display your many errors. This man either did not follow that rule or failed in doing so.

As Law360 reported this week (sub. req’d), on March 2 a judge ordered the prosecutor to show up and explain why he should not be sanctioned for violating Federal Rule 11 given that he signed a response brief that included multiple fabricated quotations and misstated the holdings of several cases. The other side had pointed out the mistakes, and the prosecutor then filed a surreply attributing them to the “inadvertent filing of an unfinalized draft document.” Because that is also not something a lawyer should do, this isn’t a great defense. But the judge suspected there was more to it, and that the “more” was called “artificial intelligence.”

At the show-cause hearing on March 10, the prosecutor confirmed that this was indeed the case.

According to the report, he told the judge he had used AI to “‘catch up’ on a draft filing after realizing he’d accidentally overwritten it.” At first I thought “overwritten” meant it was too long or too flamboyant, like the brief was in the style of Edgar Allan Poe or something. But it probably means he claimed to have lost a lot of work because he saved the wrong version. Whatever it meant, the court wasn’t buying it at all. In fact, this happened:

Judge Numbers, clearly skeptical of [the prosecutor’s] statement, pulled up a slide deck which enumerated several errors in recent case filings and asked him to explain every single one. He said the mistakes appear “diametrically opposed” to [his] statement that the errors were unintentional.

“It’s difficult to credit your response given what you’ve done here,” Judge Numbers said, referencing a misattributed quote in circuit court case law.

I have been criticized by judges, but that criticism has usually been relatively minor, and definitely has never been laid out in a slide deck so the judge and I could go through my errors one by one. I’ve had relationships that ended that way, but so far my professional career has been free of it. I hope to keep it that way.

This is yet another example of a case where someone got caught using AI and not checking the results, and then did not admit what they had done. He didn’t mention AI in the surreply at all, and when the judge asked him about that omission at the hearing, he “replied that he and [his boss] decided the surreply was appropriate”–which isn’t really an answer. He insisted that all he had done wrong was to inadvertently file an unedited draft. The judge still wasn’t buying it.

Judge Numbers didn’t let up, expressing confusion at the concept of filing anything that wasn’t final. He asked why, for any reason, [the prosecutor] used generative AI to draft anything, knowing that attorneys around the country are facing sanctions for AI use.

Because he wanted to end up in the AI Hallucination Database? Sorry, I guess that was a rhetorical question.

By the way, that database is now up to 1031 cases, 730 of them in the United States (but only one so far in Papua New Guinea, so good for them). Please don’t add to it.

Drizzly Wednesday

Mar. 11th, 2026 03:24 pm
rolanni: (Default)
[personal profile] rolanni

Where are my Maine Coon experts? I have a New Behavior between Tali and Firefly.

In general, I have a very laid back clowder presently looking out for my interests. They're even more mellow than the previous Trooper-Sprite-Belle Nexus of Purr-er.

Tali and Rook get into wrasslin, and Tali indulges in screaming Death Threats at the top of her lungs, but it's clearly just hi-jinks.

Tali and Firefly, though, have been, up until last week, maybe?, civilized and casually affectionate. They snuffle each others ears, Tali licks Firefly's head if it is presented -- which is correct, Firefly being not only the eldest, but has Time in Grade.

But lately, as I say, we have this new behavior. Firefly will be next to me on the couch, or cuddling on the bed, and Tali will arrive. Previously, a check-in (nose touching or ear snuffling) would happen, Tali would settle in an unused section of the human, and all would be well.

However! Yes, we're finally arriving at the point. Firefly has now three times gone over to Tali after I think we're all settled in, and grabs her by the back of the neck, like she's a kitten. Tali, understandably, is offended by this, and vacates the premises, whereupon Firefly either takes her place, or comes back to her previous position, and goes to sleep.

So, I obviously don't want them to be at odds. Can anybody give me insight into this New Behavior?

Spanish Aunts.
#
Helpful cat is helping

#
So, today's meal from CookUnity was Mushroom Rice in Butternut Squash. I have no leftovers. Not because it was Amazingly Tasty, though it was OK, but because about half the squash was stringy (Which could be an artifact of its adventure on the road. Or, yanno, not.), and because I hadn't been expecting, in my "mushroom rice" chunks of walnut bigger than my head.

This is possibly a Just Me problem -- I eat walnuts, but I'm not a fan, and IMHO, big hard chunks of anything have no business being present in my lovely, moist mushroom-and-cranberry rice (yes, there were sliced cranberries. Good idea; I'm going to have to try that in my own rice.) The garlicked green beans were perfectly fine.

So, I won't be ordering this one again. I picked out about half the walnuts, and, as above, quit on the squash about half-way done.

Tomorrow's meal is defrosting -- Dragon Bowl with Grilled Chicken.

All that said -- I almost forgot that I have a Zoom class this evening, so I'd best pick my feet up and get some chores done.

I have been editing from the comfy chair in my office today, and all the cats have joined me. Firefly, remains as she was, under the table next to the chair. Tali made several really creative attempts to sit with me in the chair, but just couldn't make it work, whereupon she retired to Trooper's box on the edge of my desk. Rook came in so quietly, I didn't know he was with me, until I got up and found him curled in Sprite's big fluffy cat ring, where he can keep an eye on me, and still enjoy the warmth coming off of the baseboard heater.


The Rest of the Car story

Mar. 11th, 2026 12:09 pm
susandennis: (Default)
[personal profile] susandennis
The $16 obdii reader came. It took a little over a minute to install it and that includes time out for an OH FUCK when I broke a fingernail at the quick getting the little door cover down. Anyway, another 30 seconds was killed trying to read it and learning it wanted the ignition on. Fine. Turned on the ignition and learned that it's two P2440 codes dealing with the air system.

I came upstairs and internetted and quickly learned this is a known issue with smart cars. The first 3 different reportings - two on Reddit and one on the Smart Car USA forum - noted they drove around with the error code for a year or more before they solved it finally.

My new gadget offers me the option to Clear Codes which I will do next time I turn the car on.

For now, I'm done. I'll report it next time I get the oil changed which will be about August. By that time I should be over being pissed at the car people.

Wednesday 11/03/2026

Mar. 11th, 2026 08:00 pm
lhune: (3L)
[personal profile] lhune posting in [community profile] 3_good_things_a_day
1) It had stopped raining when I had to go outside

2) The first fresh local asparagus this year :P

3) I combined one of my shores with a lovely stroll outside
[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

Last month we talked about bosses and offices with weirdly outdated expectations from a far-off era. Here are 12 of my favorite stories you shared.

1. The host

A former boss had very strong ideas about technology.

Pre-pandemic, some employees had access to Zoom and used it occasionally for in-house meetings.

Obviously, in 2020 we had to pivot to using Zoom for every meeting. My boss insisted that he be the “host” and the only “host” of Zoom meetings. He said it was important for people to know that he was host, in the sense that he was convening the meeting and responsible for the meeting outcomes. He could not be convinced that in a Zoom context, most of the hosting role involves managing the delivery of the meeting. Because he would not allow any co-hosts, so much time in meetings was spent on things like him asking someone to share their screen, when the person not have share screen permissions, and then we’d have to coach the boss, in real time, through the process of giving a meeting participant the ability to share their screen. Every time. There was no learning curve.

Relatively quickly, I started scheduling meetings and when he would ask to be “the host,” I’d say it was so weird, but Zoom wasn’t letting me make him the host, wow, technology, who knows, right? Then he would start every meeting by declaring that regardless of what the screen said, he was THE HOST of the meeting (akin to when Michael Scott on The Office “declared bankruptcy”).

2. The FedExes

My former boss, who just turned 90, had me FedEx a printed letter to Africa every time he sent an email to anyone there. This was literally in the last 10 years, so not decades ago. We’d often have a response from that person via email before FedEx even departed with the letter. These were $130ish PER LETTER to send, on our small nonprofit’s budget. Eventually I just started telling him I FedExed them even though I didn’t and he never knew the difference, but we saved so much money.

3. The “girl”

My boss shares an office with a separate business, and the other business owner insists on calling me “the girl” or “your girl” in conversations with my boss or others. It should be noted I am in my late thirties with a professional degree, not a high school student, not that that should matter. I finally started addressing him as “old man” with my boss’ approval and he has stopped talking to me all together.

4. The cost of an email

I once had a boss (~10 years ago) frantically pull me aside to ask how much money it cost to send an email. He was elated to learn it was a free action!

Same man wouldn’t allow us to have any books/newspapers, but don’t care what we were doing on the computers (this was a back-of-house retail job, so not in view of customers, but with some of the weird controlling behavior of your classic retail work). I think he was so computer illiterate that he genuinely couldn’t conceive of anything we could be doing on a computer that wasn’t work. You could fully see the screens while walking by, and people would blatantly be on Reddit/imgur with giant images and had no issue. But pull out anything on paper and we’d get in trouble. I was a college student and couldn’t do homework out of a physical textbook, but could off of a PDF of a textbook.

5. The mail merge

She was beyond computer illiterate to the point that she didn’t “trust” mail merging information, like mail merging name and address into a letter or invoice, and instead expected her people to type it out. I got dragged into the mess to show her how mail merge worked, try to teach it to her, show the high rate of errors when people are forced to type and Nope. Flat out not having it, doesn’t trust it, etc. Her staff ended up literally lying to her on how receipts and tax letters and invoices were being produced and basically blowing off work every Friday when they would work from home to … type for hours (and instead, of course took 10 minutes to mail merge).

6. The print-outs

We had an executive, just 10 years ago, whose admin would come in half an hour early so she could print out his schedule for the day, print out his emails, highlight the important bits, and assemble it all together in his leather folio for him. Then stick it under his iPad on his desk. She’d then stay late to type his email replies for him, from what he wrote on the paper.

This was the CIO. The head of IT.

7. The husband’s name

I worked at a very old-school membership library that wanted to grow their younger membership base. As the newest and youngest staff member, I was asked to contribute ideas. I pointed out that I made the initial membership contribution (before I got the job) and now worked for the org but the second I added my husband to my library account, every single piece of communication was addressed to Mrs. Husband’s First and Last Name. Including work mail. And that was something that was going to actively turn a lot of people away from joining or working with the org. Especially from the multiple universities around us.

The new director agreed but the rest of the staff, uh, did not and were very much in the “it is tradition! This is how we have always done it!” camp.

This was 2016.

8. The rules

At one place I worked, the owner hated the smell of coffee, so there were no coffee makers on site. People had to bring in their own coffee from home or a coffee shop. There were lots of other weird rules –

1. No popping popcorn in microwaves (one person put 30 minutes instead of 3, so no one was trusted with popcorn ever again).
2. Everyone must wear a name tag at all times.
3. No coats on the back of chairs (could get caught under wheels and cause an accident).
4. No temporarily keeping shared food on an empty desk (think donuts for a couple of hours). Eating at your desk was soon banned after a specific incident, even though it had previously been allowed. No clue why that day set the owner off. The owner was going to write up the employee until it was explained that the employee was on vacation and not responsible for someone else putting food on their desk.
5. All employees, including salaried employees, must use the time clock for entry, exit, and lunch breaks. The penalty for being one minute late was worse than calling off, so there would be people who literally called out from the parking lot and went back home. My team had a spreadsheet for time clock games to help us beat the system. Due to rounding, you could be gone for 14 minutes but clock a zero-minute lunch by clocking out at 12:08 and back in at 12:22, as an example. Both were rounded to 12:15, so it was a zero-minute lunch break. We used the same logic to have longer lunch breaks, since we only got 30 minutes.

9. The telex

I was brought in to do annual updates on a practice guide (big legal book designed to actually be helpful to practicing lawyers with real clients) in 2019 because the former editor was retiring. One of my recommended changes the first year was to change an example from “telex” to “facsimile.” The change wasn’t approved until the following year.

I will be doing updates this summer and might get bold and try to change it to “email.”

I only knew what a telex was because early in my career I worked on a case where the evidence went back to the 1940s, including telexes.

10. The last names

At my previous job, my boss was in her seventies – lovely woman, I really enjoyed working with her – but she insisted it was *just not done* to call anyone you worked with by their first name. The whole department was Miss, Mrs., Mr., or Dr. except for the custodian, and I’m like 90% sure that was just because he wouldn’t tell anyone his last name. Scratched it off his nametag and everything. My boss still called him Mr.

11. The sperm bank

I used to work in a small specialty medical lab. One of the services we offered was a sperm bank for men who were undergoing treatment for testicular cancer. A tech would examine the donation microscopically before freezing it to make sure it actually did contain viable sperm. Our boss would not let any of the single techs do the microscopic analysis, only the married ones could do it. He said it was inappropriate for a single woman to look at sperm.

12. The wooden blocks

About ten years ago, my sister worked in one of the largest public library systems in the United States, in a major city. Instead of emailing requests for books kept in the archives, she had to write each request on a piece of paper, rubber band the paper to a small block of wood, and throw the wooden block down the stairs into the basement/archives.

Twice a day, someone down there would gather the blocks, fill the requests, and bring up the books (for distribution to patrons) and wood (for reuse).

The post the wooden blocks, the meeting “host,” and other weirdly outdated office practices appeared first on Ask a Manager.

[syndicated profile] smartbitches_feed

Posted by Amanda

Workspace with computer, journal, books, coffee, and glasses.Happy Wednesday!

Starting next week, Links will be popping up in the mornings instead of the afternoons. Change can be scary, so I wanted to give a heads up.

Spring is starting to spring in New England, but let’s not get too comfortable. I’ve experienced snowfalls in April on several occasions. Let’s all stay strong, folks!

How’s your weather? Are you read for the some sun? Gearing up for winter?

Worlds are colliding! There is now a Bridgerton Polly Pocket set. 

For all my knitters out there, I stumbled across this YouTube account: EngineeringKnits. There are lots of videos that touch on historical practices and patterns.

Build-a-Bear is doing some marketing to adults, given that they have a romantasy-themed gift set now. I loved Build-a-Bear as a kid. It was my grandparents go-to activity for me.

I’m sure many of you have heard already that there will be a new Pride & Prejudice adaptation this year on Netflix. What do you think? Will it dethrone you favorite?

Don’t forget to share what cool or interesting things you’ve seen, read, or listened to this week! And if you have anything you think we’d like to post on a future Wednesday Links, send it my way!

Profile

spiffikins: (Default)
spiffikins

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829 3031 

Page Summary

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags